Tuesday, 4 February 2014

Production + Usage = Produsage


Produsage is the concept of being both a user and producer of digital content (Bruns, 2007)




This new and profound concept is not actually new, and this idea was coined in the early 1970's by Alvin Toffler who prophesised a future where a consumer would also be a producer and a producer would be a consumer (Bruns, 2007). 

There are four characteristics of produsage.


These characteristics are explained in detail below.
Open Participation - One important feature of produsage is that contributors openly participate with each other to create the content which ensures the content goes under constant evaluations and developments (Bruns, 2008).

Fluid Heterarchy and Holoptism - Continuing on from open participation, we have fluid heterarchy and holoptism which allows an equal balance of participants which forms a cohesive discussion to help produsage sites function. There is no hierarchy but leaders are chosen based on merits which is only probationary in a sense (Bruns, 2007). 

Palimpsestic artifacts and granularity - In support of the previous two features, this characteristic identifies that content is often unfinished or in other words raw. There is constant need to improve upon this and requires a coordinated collaboration.  By having the feature of palimpsest, it allows users to repeatedly add to information already provided. The palimpsestic feature allows users of diverse backgrounds and areas to contribute (Bauwens, n.d)

Common Property, Individual rewards - The last feature relates to participants receiving rewards and recognition of their input otherwise it will most likely halt the production of produsage sites. By making content common property, each contributor is able to receive rewards. Not normally monetary but it is something of merit (Bruns, 2007). 

Examples of Produsage sites include


Although produsage has its advantages of allowing diverse views from different cultures to be shared and providing an environment where people contribute, it also has its disadvantages which include questioning of the authenticity of the information divulged and even though people are connected, they lose a social/physical connection. 

According to Jenkins (2006) participatory culture views, advancements in technology allows new tools and avenues for collaboration and sharing ideas. As produsage is a cheap and effective way to share a message, it has become more significant in a growing number of peoples lives. Produsage can be done by anyone, anywhere at any time which invites other people to participate and shared common interests about certain information. Even businesses are honing in on this useful tool as a cheap and effective way to advertise.

Whilst produsage, is a very powerful and collective way of providing content, what will happen if this gets taken over by one or a few powerful entities, perhaps the government and is then controlled by them. What then for produsage? 

I leave you now with an excellent produsage parody.



Signing out for now, See you next week, KM!



References

Bruns, Axel (2007) Produsage: Towards a Broader Framework for User-Led Content 
Creation. In Proceedings Creativity & Cognition 6, Washington, DC.
Bruns, Axel (2008). Blogs, Wikipedia, Second Life, and Beyond. From Production to Produsage. Peter Lang. p. 21

Bruns, Axel (2008). "The Future Is User-Led: The Path towards Widespread Produsage"Fiber Cultural Journal 11. Retrieved 16 February 2013.

Jenkins, Henry (2006) Convergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide, New York University Press

Produsage Remix Engage - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TcRTVk2ZC4Y viewed 5th February 2014


5 comments:

  1. Kristy,
    Your post is really well set out and easy to read. I think you have explained the four key elements of produsage well - I started to do this in my post but found that I couldn't get succinct explanations or describe these clearly, so I scrapped it!

    I also liked how you have pointed out how reliability of information and its sources is a problem. To me, this is produsage's biggest disadvantage. Take for example wikipedia - I have found myself using this quite a bit through my studies - using it as a quick and easy way to find out more info. on something and gain a greater understanding. However, I found myself thinking the other day "...I can't add this in, I don't know where this has come from and whether it is true at all?". I wonder how we could counteract this, how could we qualify users that add content?!

    I did wonder a little more on your comment about losing a social/physical connection - I did wonder in what way would this be lost?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hi Jenni,
    Thanks for your comments :)
    I am the same with wikipedia, I just use it to get a general understanding and then if that information is the same as information that I found from academic sources then I feel a sense of a relief. I generally use wikipedia when I am running blind and have no idea about the topic at hand. It is great in providing an overview of a topic but definitely not reference worthy.
    I was thinking maybe a way that it could be counteracted is by the contributor needs to provide an academic reference or something.

    For this comment about losing a social/physical connection, what I mean is that we become so absorbed in our lives through the usage of the social media and technology that we do not allow time to properly and physically socially interact with each other and we lose those skills required to do that. Whilst we are connected to everyone, anywhere at any time, why is it that many of us still feel alone?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi Kristy
    Great post. The information was easy to read and informative. The video was very clever. I am the same with Wikipedia, it is good to get the main idea of a topic so you can research further.
    Cheers
    Sheridan

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Kristy,
    Great blog! I found this topic a little dry compared to some of the other blogs we've had to write, but you managed to make yours really interesting with good use of graphics, charts and a video. I agree with your comment about using Wikipedia to provide an overview of a topic. I do get worried that Wikipedia's information (true or not) sticks in my mind as though I thought it up myself haha. I definitely prefer the original Pulp Fiction to your video clip though but a good example :)
    Lisa

    ReplyDelete
  5. Allow me to introduce the LE-MERIDIAN FINANCING SERVICES. the loan company that grant me loan of 5,000,000.00 USD When other loan investors has neglect my offer but Le_Meridian Funding Service grant me success loan.they are into directly in loan financing and project  in terms of investment. they provide financing solutions to companies and individuals seeking access to capital markets funds, they can helped you fund your project or expand your business.. Email Contact:::: lfdsloans@lemeridianfds.com Also  lfdsloans@outlook.com or Write on whatsapp Number  on    1-(989-394-3740)Good Intend,

    ReplyDelete